<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sirius XM&#8217;s Potential Q2/09 Subscriber Numbers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/</link>
	<description>Satellite Radio News &#38; Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 21:50:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Wills</title>
		<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2396</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 23:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satwaves.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-2396</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2355&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@sxminvestor &lt;/a&gt; 

Because one is wrong and one is write. There is no way that Sirius XM will have positive subs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2355" rel="nofollow">@sxminvestor </a> </p>
<p>Because one is wrong and one is write. There is no way that Sirius XM will have positive subs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2383</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satwaves.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-2383</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-2355&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@sxminvestor &lt;/a&gt;


One is going way off the reservation and the other is staying well on it. I would listen to Tyler on this one. I have said before that it would be in the 300,000 range that might be a little high. Taking into account the OEM numbers there is no way they are positive this quarter though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-2355" rel="nofollow">@sxminvestor </a></p>
<p>One is going way off the reservation and the other is staying well on it. I would listen to Tyler on this one. I have said before that it would be in the 300,000 range that might be a little high. Taking into account the OEM numbers there is no way they are positive this quarter though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2382</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satwaves.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-2382</guid>
		<description>Brandon you are a nut case if you think they have positive sub growth this quarter. Now while it is a fact because of the subsidies they pay out and GM being one of the worst they should have a good quarter on almost all other mertrics, not to mention the fact that they will have alot of extra revenue coming in from the rest of the rate increases. The question that remains is how do investors take the bad sub numbers along with the other good and greatly improving metrics. I also would not get to ahead of myself on predicting such a up side like a GAAP profit. Lets face it Mel knew full well what was coming down the pike as far as increases. The only question there is how much did he underestimate this time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brandon you are a nut case if you think they have positive sub growth this quarter. Now while it is a fact because of the subsidies they pay out and GM being one of the worst they should have a good quarter on almost all other mertrics, not to mention the fact that they will have alot of extra revenue coming in from the rest of the rate increases. The question that remains is how do investors take the bad sub numbers along with the other good and greatly improving metrics. I also would not get to ahead of myself on predicting such a up side like a GAAP profit. Lets face it Mel knew full well what was coming down the pike as far as increases. The only question there is how much did he underestimate this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sxminvestor</title>
		<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2355</link>
		<dc:creator>sxminvestor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 23:08:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satwaves.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-2355</guid>
		<description>Tyler wrote an article this weekend and insists again in a post he created about 2Q subs that they will be negative, not as bad as 1st Q, but negative.

How could we have 2 people on complete ends of the spectrum here ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tyler wrote an article this weekend and insists again in a post he created about 2Q subs that they will be negative, not as bad as 1st Q, but negative.</p>
<p>How could we have 2 people on complete ends of the spectrum here ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Zarlino</title>
		<link>http://satwaves.com/blog/2009/07/05/sirius-xms-potential-q209-subscriber-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-2344</link>
		<dc:creator>John Zarlino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://satwaves.com/blog/?p=2456#comment-2344</guid>
		<description>Well done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
