Voice Your Opinion To The FCC Regarding Sirius XM

VN:F [1.9.3_1094]
Rating: 9.1/10 (23 votes cast)

By David “Newman” Phillips

David "Newman" Phillips responds to the FCC regarding Sirius XM and WCS issuesAs stated on this weeks Satwaves Radio Show, I stated that I would publish my official response to the FCC regarding the Sirius XM (SIRI) vs WCS Coalition proposals. If anyone does not know what I am talking about, feel free to head over to the FCC website and look at what is going on, and then read my cowriter Brandon Matthew’s posts from this week. Anyone who is a serious investor in Sirius XM, or even a devoted fan to the service, needs to take note of what is going on and make sure you get your voice heard. Quite literally, this is something that has the potential to be devastating to Sirius XM. Below is my official letter that I have submitted to the FCC. I hearby give everyone the permission to copy and paste this letter as THEIR official response to the FCC (obviously you would want to change the name at the end!).

Letter after the jump…

March 10th, 2010

Re: IB Docket No. 07-293

March 10th, 2010

To The Commission:

Sirius XM Radio purchased a portion of spectrum in the 2320 MHz to 2345 MHz range at FCC auction for $170 million dollars and then poured billions of dollars into infrastructure, satellites, content, management, etc. Sirius XM is still a fledgling company. To date, Sirius XM Radio has Net Operating Losses (NOLs) of approximately 8 BILLION dollars and have only recently reported their first ever profitable quarter. This has been over a decade in the making.

Years after Sirius XM radio purchased the spectrum licenses and began building out their infrastructure, the FCC auctioned off another portion of spectrum surrounding that of SDARS in the 2305-2320 MHz and the 2345-2360 MHz ranges. At the onset of this auction, the rules surrounding this spectrum were quite clear: NO INTERFERANCE TO SDARS WOULD BE ALLOWED. The FCC forthrightly and unequivocally stated that protecting Satellite Radio may “make mobile operations in the WCS spectrum technologically infeasible.” With this in mind, companies submitted their bids for spectrum. As a result, the entire WCS spectrum was auctioned for only 14 million dollars. This chunk of spectrum is 5MHz larger than the SDARS spectrum and yet for $154 million less than what the SDARS spectrum sold for. The only explanation for this is because of the restrictions placed upon the spectrum at the time of auction – restrictions that the companies who purchased this spectrum knew well ahead of time, and purchased anyways.

Fast forward to today. The FCC is considering a proposal to allow the WCS coalition to begin using the spectrum with limited restrictions. As stated by Mel Karmazin, CEO of Sirius XM Radio, “We were told bluntly that the staff proposal would enable the deployment of WCS “usage models” that would cause interference to satellite radio consumers.”

Mel Karmazin continues, “The staff offered no details about any sort of coordination or complaint process that would identify and eliminate sources of interference created by WCS networks and particularly mobile transmitters.”

In a response to the FCC dated March 9th regarding Mr. Karmazin’s letter, Paul J. Sinderbrand, Counsel to the WCS Coalition writes, ” Our fear, quite frankly, is that these restrictions could have the unintended, and unnecessary, consequence of effectively precluding the use of much of the WCS band for viable mobile broadband services.” What Mr. Sinderbrand fails to mention is that this is basically what the FCC said was a possibility when the spectrum was auctioned in the first place – and something that the companies knew point blank going into the auction. Again, I refer to the quote from the FCC that states the FCC forthrightly and unequivocally stated that protecting Satellite Radio may “make mobile operations in the WCS spectrum technologically infeasible.”

The spectrum was auctioned with the full understanding of all parties that this frequency was going to post serious technological difficulties with implementation. The WCS coalition now basically is asking the FCC to waive those restrictions. The FCC proposal contains no verbiage as to who is going to monitor for interference issues, who will be responsible for determining where the interference issues are coming from, and absolutely no  repercussions as to what the penalty will be for these interference issues. There are over 18.7 million paying subscribers to Sirius XM radio and over 35 million daily listeners who stand to have their service affected by these interference issues, myself included.

Mr. Sinderbrand writes “[T]he preliminary proposals advanced by the staff will more than adequately protect Sirius XM’s subscribers from harmful interference.” Since the WCS coalition believes that there will be no interference issues, I am sure they will not mind a few more rules imposed regarding repercussions for such interference that they insist will not happen.

1) Upon report and confirmation of negative interference, all transmissions in adjacent spectrum will be halted completely and immediately. These transmissions may not be restarted until the issue is discovered and corrected completely.

2) The WCS Coalition will reimburse Sirius XM the full cost of any subscriber who states interference issues as their reason for cancelation of services. The full cost of the subscriber shall be calculated as the sum of a)the expected payments of subscription fees and Royalty Fee Recovery expenses that would have likely been paid out over the life of the subscription (based on the average length of subscription at the time of cancelation) and b) Subscriber Acquisition Costs (SAC) for the subscriber at the time the radio was initially activated as reported in the Sirius XM quarterly reports.

3) The WCS Coalition will reimburse Sirius XM the full cost of any subscriber who calls to cancel but is kept active through promotional subscription and/or any other form of consideration (discounted radio/accessories, free internet, free Best Of subscription, etc.).

A final alternative would be to re-auction the spectrum under the new proposed rules (which now makes the spectrum much more valuable and should command much higher prices) and allow Sirius XM to be involved in this auction as a way to protect themselves from such harmful interference.

Respectfully Submitted,

David “Newman” Phillips
www.Satwaves.com
newman@satwaves.com

Voice Your Opinion To The FCC Regarding Sirius XM, 9.1 out of 10 based on 23 ratings

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Share this Post:
Digg Google Bookmarks reddit Mixx StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Buzz DesignFloat Delicious BlinkList Furl

13 Responses to “Voice Your Opinion To The FCC Regarding Sirius XM”

Trackbacks are disabled.

  • ron rende says:

    What r u people doing? Is it ur intent to abolish SAT Radio altogether? Why? Howard Stern? Ur group has done everything to slow or stop the growth / existance of this service / company. These actions can not be leagle. If these actions are, they debase morality. SIRIUS SAT is a paid service. What dont u understand? If the people do not want it they dont pay for it! There is a ton of revenue associated with the service. NASDEK for one the stock is one of the most active. I am sure that brings a lot of commissions. The company itself employees people. Those satelites LORAL makes helps out. Of course there is all the repeater stations and associated infestructure. First there was the Naked shorting thing then the XM 17 month ordeal, now u nuckle heads come up with this spectrum thing that will be the coupedegra so u hope. What about all the share holders of SIRI? Who controls u people! You nuckle heads are the ones that should be abolished! Tell me one thing/decision that you nuckle heads made that actually helped the people u say u represent!! Which group are u working for? The 2%? Why do they want it shut off? Enough already!!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +4 (from 4 votes)
    • Norman Wick says:

      Wow, you have a wonderful command of the english language. Two words: ‘Spelling’, and ‘grammar’. Help stamp out illiteracy.

      VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
      Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Carol Aryan says:

    You should of supplied the link Mr. Newman

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Joe Bailey says:

    Where is the FCC link or email to send this. Thanks!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • scken7 says:

    This has potential to be of catastrophic consequences. How in the world could Mel have gotten in this deep with the company and not known about this or had done something about it earlier on. It is just another set back that boggles my mind. Beginning to question Mel’s competence.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: -4 (from 4 votes)
  • James says:

    I have just emailed Sen. Burr of NC, will email Sen. Hagen later today. Thanks for the letter explaining the situation, I added my own thoughts before the letter.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Siri4ever says:

    The link to complain is: http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/upload/begin?procName=07-293&filedFrom=X

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Norman Wick says:

    Great article Mr. Phillips! Would you please provide the link to which I/We may send this.

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • jim says:

    where on the FCC website can i find out whats going on?

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • bowlsheet says:

    It’s always something with this stock, isn’t it?

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • William Wakemen says:

    Here we go again the FCC has, for years acted in the best interest of ??? I’ll never figure out what they are thinking, How they can survive with obvious prejudice rulings in a free society is beyond me. They must have something on somebody. Doesn’t matter how big you are or how small whether a CB Radio operator in the 50′s or a big corporation like Sirius if you anger the power they will come after you. God Bless America

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: +1 (from 1 vote)
  • Vic says:

    Long Live SIRIUS!!!!

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
  • Jammin' Jesse says:

    Why dosen’t the fcc find somewhere else to set up free internet for America.
    I have an idea. How about using the old analog television air ways to transmit intrernet? I am sick of the fcc trying to control, block or interfere with satellite SiriusXM radio. First they hold up the merger, they want to control some content, etc, and now this. Come on. Find somewhere else to do what you want. There must be space somewhere?

    VA:F [1.9.3_1094]
    Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)